A World Without Chemistry Essay

A world without chemmistry would be basically shocking. We would have no telephones, no lights, no long range informal communication! Nearly all that we use in our every day lifes relies upon science to exist, from the food we eat to the garments on our backs. On the off chance that we had never considered science we wouldn’t have fluid oxygen. This was created during the 1800s and is currently most likely most popular for its job as rocket fuel. Without rockets the space race wouldn’t have occurred, or all the ordinary things that we got from programs identified with it †from satellite TV to the web. Science has been called ‘the focal science’ in view of its job and effect on the entirety of technical disciplines. It includes the investigation of the fundamental units of issue, and without that information different sciences, for example, material science and science would not have been especially fruitful. Prior to a universe of present day science, people had constrained methods of saving nourishments. It would be exceptionally elusive clean water these days in the event that it weren’t for science. Savage waterborne ailments, for example, cholera, looseness of the bowels and typhoid would be exceptionally normal. Without science, we would not have the option to comprehend the structure of food. We would not have the option to determine what nourishments are beneficial for us and what food sources are awful. We would not have the option to gauge the time span of usability of nourishments. We likewise wouldn’t realize how to how to support our body with food that would shield us from diseases, for example, rickets, osteoporosis and scurvy. Science has empowered us to compensate for the supplements we pass up, with significant nutrients and minerals in container structure, and strengthened breakfast grains. Without science we would not have present day medication. Ailment and disease would fan out quickly! At the point when current science started to take off, by the seventeenth century, the normal future was just 35 years. Progressions in science had the option to change that. These days, the future in Ireland is 80. 32 years. Without current science we would not have had the option to accomplish such a high time of future. Without science, penicillin could never have existed, and minor cuts and brushes and second rate infections would frequently advance to genuine sickness and deadly septicaemia (blood harming). Without science we wouldn’t have salicylic corrosive! That’s the synthetic name for anti-inflamatory medicine, the modest miracle sedate which has given us alleviation from cerebral pains and fever just as assisting with forestalling strokes and respiratory failures. What's more, what might us poor, pimply young people manage without this wonderous concoction to battle every one of our spots? Everything I can say is, THANK YOU CHEMISTRY! Science assumes a major job in each part of our lives. It has permitted different sciences to bloom and has extended our aggregate information. We see how the smallest segments of the human body work and can anticipate the arrangement of planets a huge number of miles away.

Western Civilization Free Essays

(1) It has consistently been the force battle that drove individuals to revolt. Improvements in horticulture were insufficient to take care of the entire French country, particularly in the urban communities, on the grounds that the poor has consistently sufferred. Regardless of the progression in agribusiness and the utilization of present day horticultural procedures and â€Å"expected† increment in food gracefully, the costs of the food was all the while going up. We will compose a custom article test on Western Civilization or on the other hand any comparable theme just for you Request Now Why? Since it was just â€Å"more foodâ€rather than a more attractive distribution† (Brown, 2003, p. 24) which implies the laborers has still to gamble to get by in the coldblooded world. Along these lines, laborer agitation in 1789 in the end came into see with such a great amount of mistreatment of poor people. To end steady uproars and exhibits, the legislative issues during that time accepted that poor people can be put aside forbidding them to cast their votes and causing them to develop food produce for the well off. Indeed, even the constitution that time segregates poor by putting such a great amount of accentuation on singular private property possession â€Å"at the cost of any privilege of the poor to subsistence† (Brown, 2003, p. 24). The agitation in 1789 was an episode where agribusiness assumed a significant job. Without farmers’ endeavors to give food in the urban regions, or if the yield these ranchers worked produce an awful reap, the impacts were essentially crushing: soaring food costs, joblessness, and bedlam. (2) There was such a great amount of advancements in the eighteenth century Europe prompting acquisitions of different provinces by various European countries. Not including earlier turns of events, even the fifteenth and sixteenth century Rennaissance and Reformation, this eighteenth century alone has been a wonderful period. Who could envision Napoleon crushed? Furthermore, it occurred in this period and â€Å"it starts and finishes with the dissatisfaction of an endeavor to rule the Continent by its driving force, and between lie the occasions which achieved the French Revolution and its outcome. â€Å"(Cowie, 1963, p. 1) Europeans’ lifestyle during that period may be changed yet they all have shared a long history together and comparable longings and in this manner usually, copy the beneficial things that can be found in one another. For the Englishmen, they had opportunity from having their interests done, particularly the opportunity to communicate and compose and this was seen as a positive thing not exclusively to themselves yet to different countries in the landmass. Similar standards apply with the French chaateaux and its outstanding tastes. What's more, what about the Europeans’ burdens to have provinces? These were clearly spread out in the Treaty of Utrecht and in the Treaty of Vienna. Also, when? Normally, that was in the eighteenth Century Europe! The most effective method to refer to Western Civilization, Papers Western Civilization Free Essays string(100) was this exchange he understood his father’s worth on the grounds that the last was isolated from him. Some of the time, it is extremely simple to peruse books about the lives of the genuine individuals who had the option to conquer the essence in their own lives. The harder their difficulties and troubles were, the all the more engaging it will be for the perusers. We will in general be intrigued with individuals who had the option to compose a record of their among life and passing encounters and how they nearly kick the bucket. We will compose a custom exposition test on Western Civilization or then again any comparative theme just for you Request Now Be that as it may, we tend to overlook how hard it may be for them to record their own account of harshness and much more terrible if their sad experience was basically the start of a more terrible condition. The two writers in the books that will be dissected and looked at in this paper had the boldness to relate their own encounters and embarrassment as a Jew during World War II for the world to observe and recall the mercilessness of the War. The two of them persevered through the torment as they review the torment they had experienced and explicitly stated them. They described how quiet and promising their lives were before the World War in the habitation with their families. In any case, the war had torn them with everything that could have included themselves. They were damaged by gigantic and ruthless passings of individuals, their friends and family notwithstanding. The two writers were the heroes of their books. It depended on their direct encounters during the war. On the off chance that we will examine the two books, we would have a thought how merciless the Nazi’s were and how lamentable the Holocaust was. The primary book was a portrayal of the genuine encounters in the Holocaust in the viewpoint of a Transylvanian child as he saw the merciless passing of his relatives and how it increased an effect in his confidence and his life. Then again, the other book portrayed a similar occasion on the point of view of a Czech little girl who lost her family and sufficiently fortunate to have the option to get away and come back to her old neighborhood in Prague. The main thing was her break in that war didn't extra her. It just opened the entryway that drove her to another war and another torment she needed to tolerate (Kovaly). On the off chance that we are going to think about records of two creators, we first need to think about the foundation of each creator. We need to recognize the convincing powers in their lives that gave a mix in their works. The primary book was titled â€Å"Night†, which was composed by the writer Elie Wiesel. He started his story by portraying his town in Sighet, his family and himself in the year 1942 when he was just twelve years of age. He had three sisters and his father was a businessperson and a revered Jewish pioneer. Their family was profoundly strict; in actuality, Elie was eager in learning the authoritative opinion of their religion. He needed to find out more and he had an exceptionally profound confidence in God (Wiesel). Be that as it may, this changed when the Germans showed up and caught their property in 1944. In spite of the early notice of an individual who endure and saw the abuse that the Jews endured in Poland, his townsmen didn't regard. Or maybe, they just ridiculed him. It was year 1944 when they lament not to take legitimate thought of the counsel given by the elderly person. The Germans attacked their territory and moved all the Jews out of Sighet to inhumane imprisonments in Auschwitz. The Germans were welcoming from the outset yet out of nowhere gave an announcement that they ought to be seized and moved into ghettos and death camps. They had no clue on what might occur straightaway. It would have been a gift in the event that they would be executed quickly to save them from torment and wretchedness. Be that as it may, it was a passionate expectation of the Nazi’s to force desolations to these strict individuals as forced by the pioneer, Adolf Hitler. They were dealt with like creatures as they were being shipped to the inhumane imprisonments. At the point when they arrived at the gathering community, Elie was for all time isolated with her mother and sister since they were coordinated to the gas chamber. He was left distinctly with his dad. Inside the camp, they had to observe how the honest children where savagely consumed and a large number of individuals crying despondently. It was his first night in the camp however it made a permanent imprint on Elie’s heart. It was the night that he questioned God’s respect. That night, he believed that his God likewise passed on. It was the night that broke down his confidence and excitement forever. At a youthful age, Elie saw the pitilessness of life and that he is only a little spot of useless being who needed to battle appetite, mistreatment and wounds so as to endure. He was before a strict understudy whose life around then relied upon the impulses of the Nazi’s. His temperances changed. His concept of counter against anyone who might take steps to hurt his family changed and transformed into his despondency to live. His anxiety changed as he endured blows and battled to live. His fundamental worry that was recently centered around God veered off to whatever could fill his stomach. In the camp, they were distinguished not with their name however with their number to connote maybe that their lives don't make a difference, they are simply negligible numbers. He didn't gaze toward his dad as a gift since they are as yet alive however a revile, a weight that may cause him his life. The difficult work and cruel conditions caused him to deny God (Wiesel). Their exchange to another camp in Buna served another test to Elie. He had changed. His god had as of now kicked the bucket and hanged in the hangman's tree. He was beaten and his agony did not make any difference anymore. Days and evenings don't have any distinction nor demise and life. It was this exchange he understood his father’s worth on the grounds that the last was isolated from him. You read Western Civilization in class Papers They needed to buckle down so as to live. This was the last camp they had been before they begun the most agonizing walk. It was the walk that isolated Elie for all time from his dad. It was the walk that drove a child away from his caring dad. It was the walk that denied them of food and water and were even derided by the gatekeepers A ton of detainee slaughtered even their own kinfolk only for a piece of bread. Out of the hundred detainees who walked, just twelve endure and arrived at Buchenwald where his dad at long last passed on of diarrhea and cut off beating from the official and other detainee. It was the peak of Elie’s faculties. It was a long time before the guides showed up and he could be at long last marked as Holocaust Survivor. This was the apocalypse War II and the finish of this book. Be that as it may, this period was just the start of the other book (Wiesel). The other book, â€Å"Under the Cruel Star: An actual existence in Prague 1941-1968†, the writer portrayed her life as a Jew in the Lodz camp. Her name was Heda Margolius Kovaly. Yet they were in an alternate nation and ghettos, their strict confidence got them into comparative destiny the ghettos. Heda and her family were sent to Lodz ghetto. She

The Pros and Cons of Sole Proprietorship

The Pros and Cons of Sole Proprietorship One of the major considerations that entrepreneurs and businessmen make when they are planning to start a new business is its legal structure. Should it be a partnership or should they form a corporation instead? Maybe it would be better to just set it up as a sole proprietorship? There are several factors affecting this decision, including the type or nature of business and the availability of capital or resources required to set up the business and start its operations. Others are more circumspect, however, and prefer to look into the various characteristics of the legal structures and weigh their pros and cons, in order to see which structure fits their need the best. © Shutterstock.com | vgstudioIn this article, you will learn 1) what is the sole proprietorship and 2) what are the advantages and disadvantages of starting a business as a sole proprietorship.THE SOLE PROPRIETORSHIPQuite easily the most common business structure and the simplest out of all the other structures, a “sole proprietorship” is a business that is owned by only one person. Many people are confused whether the phrase applies to the business owned by one person or the one person who owns that business. It refers to both: the business and the owner since, in this type of structure, there is no legal distinction between the owner and the business.To understand the concept further, let us break down the basic features of the sole proprietorship.A sole proprietorship is owned and run by one person, where the person often runs the business under his own name.A sole proprietorship does not have a separate legal entity. This is its major difference from partnerships and corpora tions.The sole proprietor (the owner) owns all the assets of the business.The sole proprietor also bears all the risks and the benefits associated with it.We can gain a better understanding of a sole proprietorship, and be aided in our decision on whether to choose this type of structure or not, by taking into account its various pros and cons.PROS OF A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIPThe following are the advantages or benefits that you can enjoy in a sole proprietorship type of business.1. Easy setup or formationA sole proprietorship is very easy to form, which most likely explains why it is the oldest type of business structure known to man. Creation of a sole proprietorship does not involve the formal creation of a business organization. It can be a one-man operation, where the sole proprietorship has only one employee, who also happens to be the owner.Setting it up requires very little paperwork or legal formalities. This is the complete opposite of corporations or partnerships, where you h ave to prepare sets of documents and submit them to specific regulatory agencies and government bodies. The business can be formed by simply filing with the local office in your city or locality.It is not necessary to set up a separate trade name for the business. The sole proprietor can proceed to doing business under his or her own name.There are small startup costs involved. A sole proprietorship is also the least expensive to set up. While it is true that it is not entirely free to form it, the legal fees that have to be paid (such as permits and licenses) are usually minimal.This simplicity is the primary reason why individuals who are attempting to go into business for the first time choose it. Consultants and professionals often take this option when they want to go into business for themselves. They can start small, as a way to “test the waters”, before considering taking the next step and expanding their business operations. Many partnerships and corporations â€" even t he large companies we see today â€" started out small, as sole proprietorships.This also makes it possible for practically anyone to set up a business. Even if you have limited assets or resources, you can start your own sole proprietorship, since there is no minimum amount of startup capital that must be met.2. Management flexibilityThe reason why many individuals go into business is because they want to “be their own boss”. They want to be the one in control, holding the reins, and making all the decisions.The sole proprietor has complete power over the decision-making. He is the only one running the business, so all the decisions are made by him. It certainly spares him the headaches of getting the approval of a board of directors (in case of corporations) or the consent of other partners (in a partnership business). This also cuts down the time it usually takes between arriving at a decision and implementing it, since it cuts through any delays or deadlocks usually encounter ed in a bureaucratic environment.The owner has the sole discretion when it comes to costs incurred by the business. He is, after all, the one holding the purse strings of the company, so it is up to him how to allocate the costs and utilize the resources of the business. This is not something that can be done in a corporation or a partnership, since costs have to be subjected to a series of scrutiny by all the partners and stakeholders.This also means that the sole proprietor also gets to solely enjoy the profits that will be earned by the business from its operations. In a partnership, depending on the agreement among the partners as to their share in earnings, they will have to split the net income (after tax) among themselves. The sole proprietor has no one to split with, so he gets to enjoy all the profits by himself.Management flexibility results in faster pace of transactions. Response is quicker on the part of the manager in terms of decision-making because you get to do it a lone. You call all the shots, so you can move forward, instead of being held back waiting for what others have to say about a certain matter related to the business.3. Less government controlA sole proprietorship is subject to only a few regulations. This is already noticeable from the time you set up the business. A simple and quick trip to the local business office is enough to have your business registered. You will not be required by many government and regulatory agencies to submit a lot of documentation for your business, which is the case with corporations and partnerships.Corporations and partnerships are governed by specific rules and regulations that they must comply with, such as issues relating to their organizational structure and the like. Sole proprietors are not bound by these guidelines and can run their business in the manner they deem fit.4. Tax advantagesTaxation is one of the touchy subjects when it comes to business. Sole proprietorships have the benefit of bei ng subject to simpler taxation procedures; since it is not a separate entity, it is not taxable. That does not mean, however, that it is completely free from having to pay taxes.In a partnership or a corporation, the business entity will have to file its own tax return, and the owner-partners or stockholders have to file their own separate tax returns for the income that they received from the operations of the business.This is not the case in a sole proprietorship. Remember that the owner of the sole proprietorship business is not considered to be distinct from the business itself. It means they are treated as one and the same, so there is a need for only one income tax return: that of the owner or sole proprietor. Any income earned by the business is also income earned by the owner. Taxing them both, separately, would be a case of double taxation.This means that the sole proprietorship also gets the advantage of being subjected to lower tax rates, since there are separate (and hig her) rates when it comes to business taxation and corporate taxation, as compared to income taxation, which is what sole proprietors are liable for.To sum it up, there is only one tax return that will be filed, and it is not a requirement to attach a balance sheet of the business as a supporting document to the tax return.5. Least amount of recordkeepingBooks of accounts of partnerships and corporations are considerably more complicated than that of a sole proprietorship. You have to maintain separate books for the partners, the business, and for taxation purposes. There are certainly more ledgers and records to maintain. In a sole proprietorship, recordkeeping is straightforward. In fact, the owner is not even required to avail the services of a bookkeeper or an accountant since he can do it himself. Corporations and partnerships are expected to present formal financial statements, so they have a financial team to take care of the recording and recordkeeping process. Minutes of mee tings have to be taken diligently. This is not the case in smaller, sole proprietorship type of businesses.6. Easy dissolutionIt is as easy to cease all operations of a sole proprietorship as it was to set it up. Once the owner decides to stop running the business, he can easily do so. There is no need to undergo a lengthy process since the business does not have very formal registrations binding it. All it takes is to pay off all the business debts and obligations and close all accounts. Of course, you have to notify the tax authorities about the dissolution of the business for tax purposes.CONS OF A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIPNow it is time to look at the other side of the coin and take into consideration the disadvantages of choosing the sole proprietorship business structure.1. Unlimited personal liability of the sole proprietorThis is the downside of being the only one who owns the business and enjoying its profits: you are also left to shoulder all its liabilities as well as its losse s, if any. Corporations, which are considered to be separate legal entities from the incorporators and shareholders, offer liability protection (to varying extent) from the debts and actions of the business.They will only be liable up to the extent of their investment in stocks or shareholdings in the business, and their personal assets remain theirs. The same is true for partnerships, particularly LLCs, or limited liability companies.The sole proprietor does not have any protection from liability, since the debts and obligations of the business are also his debts and obligations. In the event that the business has incurred major losses and is unable to pay its debts, the creditors can go after the proprietor’s personal assets, from his car, house and other real and personal properties. Even his savings will become fair game to creditors and everyone else that the business owes. In other words, sole proprietors are at risk of losing practically everything if their business does no t succeed.The same is true when someone files a case in court against the business. In effect, this is tantamount to the owner or sole proprietor being sued. In case the business loses the case, the owner will be personally liable.2. Uncertain business lifeCorporations are deemed to have an unlimited life, with the concept of going concern holding that it is expected to continue existing for the foreseeable future, even if the original incorporators, the stockholders, and managers resign or even die. This is the same with a partnership, where the withdrawal of one partner does not automatically mean that the business ceases to exist. The remaining partners can simply come up with a revised partnership agreement, without the operations of the business being affected.Continuity of the business is an issue when it comes to sole proprietorships. It has been said that the owner and the business are a single entity; that means, therefore, that the retirement or death of the owner, and any impairment that will render him incapable of making decisions or managing the business, will automatically mean the cessation of the business and its operations. Yes, it is easy to dissolve, but this also indicates fragility in the existence and continuity of the business.3. Difficulty in raising capital or obtaining financingThis is deemed by many as one of the biggest disadvantages of a sole proprietorship. You are setting the business up with the intention of being the only one in control. Naturally, raising the capital you need is entirely up to you. This is why most sole proprietorships use their own money when starting their business. The working capital of the business will be limited to the funds of the sole proprietor, and other funds that it can obtain through loans.There is the added disadvantage of banks, lending and financing institutions that are more wary about extending loans or granting financial aids to sole proprietorships. These sources of financing often look i nto the stability of a business as a going concern (and we have already established that the life of a sole proprietorship is uncertain and fragile) and its assets which is often fewer than, say, a corporation or a partnership with more partners pooling their resources together. Banks and lenders view these as an indication of the capability of the business to meet its dues and repay its obligations. On these counts, sole proprietorships are not attractive prospects for investors and lenders.When corporations require funding for expansion or some other major project, it can issue equity in the form of shares of stocks. They are also in a better position to have lines of credit and have an easier time obtaining bank loans.4. Limited view in business managementThere is a hitch in having full control of the management of the business. You call all the shots, what you say goes, and you pretty much make the decisions on everything. There are higher chances of your objectivity being impai red because you are the only one making the decisions. In a partnership, you have partners to throw ideas around with. In a corporation, you have a team to brainstorm with.In a way, being the only one making the decisions is a heavy burden to bear. The success and the failure of the business all boils down to you, so unless you have strong grit and you feel confident that you can handle possible failure, you might want to rethink setting up a sole proprietorship.5. Less business-like in appearanceCompared to a corporation or a partnership, which are legal entities, a sole proprietorship is often viewed as one that is not as professional or like a business. This is most likely because it did not undergo the rigid procedures that corporations and partnerships did when it started out. It looks informal to the public.It is hard to say outright whether a sole proprietorship is the best business structure for you to start with. There are certain considerations to be made, and in-depth ana lysis is required. Some of these factors include the type of business you will want, the product or service you will offer, the market that you are trying to enter, and even the resources available to you for your capital.

Free Math Worksheets to Practice Graphs and Charts

Dr. Seagraves An Elderly African American Woman - 982 Words

It was almost midnight when I got the call from Dr. Seagraves. She told me to meet her in the physicians lounge at 7 am: we had a case. The next morning began like any other in the operating room. We met with the patient, I received permission to observe and then got suited up for case. The patient was an elderly African American woman, she called me handsome and smiled comfortably. When we made it into the OR I was asked to help lift the patient from bed to table, with a subtle warning of â€Å"watch out, it’s gooey.† Dr. Seagraves parted the patient’s gown, exposing a mass of raw tissue that somewhat resembled a leg. The patient had suffered a week’s worth of necrotizing fasciitis, more commonly known as flesh eating bacteria. The wound had a certain odor, a putrid smell you do not forget. Our hearts sank in unison as we realized what we were up against. We had to act fast. Dr. Seagraves began scrubbing the wounded tissue as the Anaestesiologist monitor ed the patient’s progress. I had observed Dr. Seagraves on multiple occasions and never did she express concern for the outcome. For the first time in our relationship I heard her mutter, â€Å"This is not good. This is not good at all.† The bacteria spread fast, leaving the leg unsalvageable. The question on all of our minds was why the patient had waited so long to seek treatment. Surely she was in a lot of pain, and that odor... why wait? The answer was purely financial. Money deterred her from seeking treatment which caused aShow MoreRelatedThe Physician s Lounge At 7 Essay912 Words   |  4 PagesIt was almost midnight when I got the call from Dr. Seagraves. She told me to meet her in the physician’s lounge at 7 am; we had a case. The next morning began like any other in the operating room. We met with the patient, I received permission to observe and then got suited up for the case. The patient - who I will call Cheryl - was an elderly African American woman. She called me handsome and smiled comfortably. Dr. Seagraves pulled back the patient’s gown with a subtle warning of â€Å"watch out, it’s

Film Critique, Why Did I Get Married 2 Free Essays

Why Did I Get Married? Efrem Terrell ENG 225 Intro to Film Professor Nelly Aguilar April 22, 2012 Why Did I Get Married Released in 2007 by Lions Gate Entertainment Corporation, the film Why Did I Get Married? is a comedy and drama that was written, produced, and directed by screen and playwright, Tyler Perry. Depicting the trials and tribulations of marriage, Why Did I Get Married? Was a hit at the box office earning $55,862,886 worldwide (Perry, 2007). Along with several other films and stage productions written and directed by Tyler Perry, the success of Why Did I Get Married? ay be credited to Perry’s expertise in film directing, digital musical selections, and humorous dialogue, along with the film’s dramatic, yet therapeutic storyline on how to sustain a healthy marriage and maintain lifelong friendships. We will write a custom essay sample on Film Critique, Why Did I Get Married 2 or any similar topic only for you Order Now As the director of Why Did I Get Married? , Tyler Perry utilizes incongruous editing in order to establish a central theme for the movie by allowing the audience to get to know each character and establish a theatrical connection with them. As each main character is introduced, Perry jumps around in time displaying each character acting out dramatic and humorous scenes that revealed their true personalities, relationships with the other characters in the film, along with their roles in the movie. While most writers subtly introduce their characters to the audience, movie critics argue that this is an area in Perry’s writing that needs strengthening. According to freelance writer and movie critic, Eric D. Snider (2012), in the film Why Did I Get Married? Tyler Perry’s characters blatantly announce expository dialogue such as, â€Å"I am a Pediatrician,† â€Å"You have control issues,† and â€Å"You could lose about fifty pounds, then I might be somewhat attracted to you. † Movie critics believe that stronger writing would reveal this information without the characters declaring it (Snider, 2012). While directors carefully select the best scenes for their movies, they also spend a great deal of time selecting the best soundtrack. Digital musical selections graced the original soundtrack for the film, Why Did I Get Married?. RB ballads that referenced love, relationships, break-ups, and heart-ache drove the central them of the movie which focuses on the ups and downs of marriage and friendships. Each song from the soundtrack played throughout the movie, helping to tell the story of the film, and draw the audience in by shaping the characters with tempo, range, pitch, and melody. The cinematography for the film, Why Did I Get Married? was performed by Toyomichi Kurita (â€Å"Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married, 2012). Kurita creates strong moods and feelings throughout the film with the use of camera shots, movement, and lighting. Scenes throughout the film are solid and clear creating a natural illusion of the set and atmosphere. The audience is able to relate to the emotions of the characters due to the imagery created by Kurita’s strong cinematography skills. Scenes throughout the film flowed seamlessly, displaying vibrant lighting, while establishing a strong connection between the audience and the film. Editing provided by Maysie Hoy appeared flawless throughout the film. There was strong cohesion among characters as they appeared to have all been filmed at the same place at the same time. The transitions between scenes throughout the film created a natural setting and a feeling as though the viewers were traveling along on the same journey with the characters as the moved from place to place (Perry, 2007). The storyline of the film Why Did I Get Married? centers around the day-to-day struggles of maintaining solid relationships, successful careers, and strong friendships. In order to resolve marital problems, four married couples, who are old college friends, attended an annual retreat in the cold, wintery mountains of Colorado. While the vacation was intended for married couples only, one of the wives decided to bring along an attractive and single female friend by the name of Trina. Throughout the week-long retreat, damaging secrets are revealed that puts each couple in the position to question their own marital relationships along with their friendships with the other couples. As bouts of infidelity come to light, it is also revealed that the single and seductive Miss Trina has been having an affair with the husband of the woman that referred to her as a friend and invited her to the retreat. The film explores the emotional distress that infidelity, lust, and love may weigh upon a marriage. Continuous battles with issues of commitment, betrayal, and forgiveness force each character in the film to evaluate their lives as individuals and as committed couples (Snider, 2007). Patricia (Janet Jackson) is a highly regarded and very famous psychiatrist. Her book about marriage has just won a very prestigious award. Still, a tragedy in her past has driven a wedge into her marriage to architect Gavin (Malik Yoba). Things aren’t much better with said pals; Angela (Tasha Smith) is a loudmouth drunk constantly denigrating her struggling husband Marcus (Michael Jai White). Diana (Sharon Leal) is a driven attorney. Having just made partner, she can’t find time for her young daughter, or depressed spouse (Perry). But the worst situation exists between Shelia (Jill Scott) and Mike (Richard T. Jones). He is constantly calling her fat. He’s also cheating on her with best friend Trina (Denis Boutte). When the group gets together for their annual vacation, everyone is on edge. Soon secrets will be revealed, leaving everyone wondering about the state of their relationship (Perry, 2007). The recurring theme that is raised in Tyler Perry’s film Why Did I Get Married? Is â€Å"Can These Marriages Survive? † The infidelity of two husbands leads to the discussion of the â€Å"80/20 Rule. † The rule simply implies that within a marriage, most people only receive eighty-percent of what they want and need from their partners, leading them to go outside of their relationship in an effort to find what they think they are missing. Usually, it’s not until the spouse has stepped out the relationship that they realize that now only twenty-percent of their needs are being met. At this point, they have left their eighty for their twenty, which is a significant downgrade. Watching a Tyler Perry movie is a strange and ecstatic experience, Perry’s desire for shenanigans, inanity and heightened emotions always makes for an entertaining evening, but his films are in a strange in-between space: between melodrama and traditional drama, between lternative cinema and Hollywood style, and between black authenticity and pure elitism. Through it all, what vexes film scholars especially critics, is how style, content, auteurism and culture clash and miss each other in Tyler Perry’s films. Still Perry is one of a handful of black filmmakers- including Antoine Fuqua, John Singleton, Spike Lee, and Lee Daniels, whom can all actually raise money for wide release films. Perry films are primarily ways to talk abo ut black progress and authenticity in a â€Å"post-racial† world, and they absorb all the baggage involved in that project. They are moral tales about maintaining traditional family structures (including, usually, men at the head), the importance of the church and elders, even at the exclusion of gays, and not always, though sometimes, of others: like loose and lost women, drug users etc (Snider, 2007). As of November 1, 2007, on the review Aggregator Rotten Tomatoes, 46% of the critics gave the film positive reviews, based on 33 reviews. On Metacritic, the film had an average score of 54 out of 100 based on 12 reviews. Paul Grenada said that while â€Å"there are times where the script seems stiff, it teaches without hammering, and you leave the movie feeling good about what you saw. † Giving the movie a B-, Entertainment Weekly said that Perry is of the â€Å"spell-everything-in-capital-letters and act-it-out-loudly schools,† but added that â€Å"one performance glistens—Jill Scott’s as the sad, heavyset Shelia, who locates the faith that’s the source of love. † Time magazine gave the film a B and called it the â€Å"usual artless mix of broad comedy, teary confessions and spiritual uplift. † In the opening weekend, the film grossed $21. million in 3,105 theaters in the United States and Canada, ranking #1 at the box office. In the second weekend, the film slipped to #2 in the box office charts, with a gross of $12. 1 million, bringing the 10-day total to over $38 million. In total, the film domestically grossed $55,862,886 (Gleiberman, 2007). The a wards and nominations that the Tyler Perry’s film â€Å"Why Did I Get Married† received were from the Image Awards, it was nominated for Outstanding Motion Picture, Jill Scott who played Shelia in the film was nominated for Outstanding Actress in a Motion Picture, Tyler Perry himself was nominated for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Motion Picture, and then there’s Janet Jackson whom won the Image Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Motion Picture. The issue of matrimony is not a new one to Tyler Perry, almost all of his efforts, both for the stage and screen, have focused on relationships growing, struggling, dissolving, or playing out their post-breakup end games. The decision to create a single overview on the subject seems unnecessary at best. Yet Perry is nothing if not knowledgeable, especially when it comes to his audience. He clearly understands that, even though he’s offering the same old stories, they can’t get enough of the way he tells them. For his film adaptation of the couple’s comedy why did I Get Married? He may have altered the very purpose of his otherwise amicable preaching. But at this point in Perry’s career his ability to sell movie tickets in spite of poor critical reception is no surprise, the actor, author, and filmmaker has gone from promoting his own plays to becoming a full-fledged brand, one that, although created outside of the Hollywood machine, is causing some industry people to take notice (Gleiberman 2007). The film is filled with tears, laughter, and shocking disappointments as friends are betrayed and relationships fall apart due to the foibles of marriage. Have you taken a good look at your marriage lately? Is your marriage what you thought it would be? Have you had to deal with issues of commitment or betrayal or forgiveness? Is there a time when you seriously considered whether or not to stay with your spouse? Over the years, have you had to figure out a way to maintain true love and a solid relationship even during difficult times? And during the rough patches, have you ever secretly asked yourself the question: â€Å"Why Did I Get married? † Why Did I Get Married is one of Tyler Perry’s greatest films yet; leaving some members of the audience filled with emotions as they wonder to themselves, â€Å"Why did I get married? †, while others question, â€Å"Should I stay married? † REFERENCES Gleiberman, Owen (October 26, 2007), â€Å"Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married? † Retrieved from Entertainment Weekly (961):51 Snider, E. (2007). Why Did I Get Married?. Retrieved April 8, 2012, from http://www. ericdsnider. com/movies/why-did-i-get-married/ Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married?. Box Office Mojo. Retrieved April 6, 2012, from http://boxofficemojo. com/movies/? id=whydidigetmarried. htm Tyler Perry’s Why Did I Get Married? : Plot Summary and Details. Moviefone. Retrieved April 6, 2012, from http://www. moviefone. com/movie/tyler-perrys-why-did-i-get-married/29300/synopsis How to cite Film Critique, Why Did I Get Married 2, Essay examples

Industrial Grinders Case free essay sample

G’s large quantity of steel rings are on hand and the substantial inventory of special steel for their manufacture. And this steel as inventory can’t be sold. I. G had manufactured industrial machines for sale in numerous countries for nearly 70 years. It means it has market to sale rings no matter whether it is steel or plastic ring. These rings could be supplied for their own machines too. In general the plants were allowed considerable leeway in administering their own affairs. Bridgeman has right to make market strategy in time. During slack periods, company has a policy of employing excess labor on various make-work projects rather than laying the men off. At that time, the salary is at about 70% of regular wages. Low labor cost will decrease the cost of production. There are a lot of steel rings on hand and can’t be sold. The total book value of these inventories exceeded ,000. We will write a custom essay sample on Industrial Grinders Case or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Large inventory means less liquid cash. Maybe it influences operation in the future. Now I. G only has steel rings and these rings have higher cost than plastic rings. Also the lives of steel rings are shorter than plastic rings. I. G’s competitor Henri Poulenc has already started selling plastic rings at the same price as steel rings. And if I. G makes plastic rings, it can start selling only after 4 months so by then Henri Poulenc will take over more market shares. The competitiveness of I. G is very weak now. The ring innovation is an opportunity for I. G, but also a kind of threat. When instead of steel rings, plastic ring I. G starts using it gives I. G a chance to reform. It could cut down the cost and improve the quality of rings. If I. G switches from steel rings to plastic rings successfully, it could expand business and get more profits because of low cost, so it’s an opportunity. However, the competitor had plastic rings in advance than I. G, so it’s threaten for I. G. Competitor could use this advantage to get more business. It maybe threat to I. G’s operation and profits. In the early 1970, Japanese manufacturers had successfully entered the field with low priced spare parts. Other companies also had appeared with low quality and lower price machines. The competition would become more intense. More competitors share one market, so each supplier needs to improve competitiveness. It’s a new challenge. After analyzing internal and external situation of I. G, we can say that I. G has strong operational capacity. However, the core problem is what to be done about the steel inventory. I. G should start developing plastic rings as soon as possible and start using those. Because the core of competition is production, even though steel ring still has its value now, the plastic ring will substitute for it sooner or later. The strong competitor of I. G is Henri Poulenc. It has already introduced plastic rings. Only if I. G produces plastic ring in time it can compete with Henri Poulenc and stop them from grasping more market share. In addition, plastic ring has lower cost and longer life than steel ring. The Table A shows the cost of 100 plastic rings is $66. 60, but 100 steel rings cost $263. 88. Obviously, if they sale at the same price, 100 plastic rings will get $197. 25 more profit than steel rings. However, Anders Ericsson, the development engineer, estimated that the plastic rings could be produced by mid-September, so before mid-September, I. G has to sell steel rings on hand. Fortunately, Henri Poulenc was said to be selling the plastic ring at about the same price as the I. G steel ring, so I. G wouldn’t get strong shock from Henri Poulenc. Of course, Henri Poulenc will get higher profit, but only analyzing from the price, I. G and Henri Poulenc are in the same position, so it depends on demanders’ preference which kind of rings they like. And I. G could sell the steel rings in different markets, which are not covered, by plastic rings of Henri Poulenc. It avoids direct conflict. Steel inventory is a big weakness of I. G, so it’s a good time to consume a large amount of steel. Assuming the sales continued at the current rate of 690 rings per week before mid-September, it would consume 19400 steel rings. During the slack time, I. G could ask labors to convert the steel inventory into rings to satisfy the supply amount before mid-September, because at that time, the labor cost will be about 70% of regular wages so that decreases the cost to produce steel rings. Those steel rings only need to satisfy the supply amounts for 4 months using, because after mid-September, plastic ring will be used instead of steel. If there are more steel rings converted than demanded, I. G will pay for labour cost from their pocket. It will waste resources, time and money. So nothing definite can be said about the steel inventory.